Reapplying to Medical School Secondaries, Interviews, School Selection Timing

With the multi-staged admissions process, applicants can make an impact at each step – or be weeded out. Your assessment continues by looking at other ways you communicated with the admissions committee, and whether or not they helped you past the next hurdle. Secondaries Your  secondary essays  go beyond the initial introduction and flesh out your application. The questions asked will generally give you a good indication of what the program values. In your review, you need to determine how well the information you provided demonstrates your fit with the values and offerings at that particular program. Did you answer the particular questions asked?  (This seems obvious, but you’d be surprised by how many essays miss the point.) Did your secondary essays offer a new or deeper look at your activities or did they regurgitate your personal statement? Viewed alongside your initial application, do they create a consistent but broader profile or is there a significant divergence from what was presented before? Did you research each school to see what made it unique? Did you bring this information into your answers, even if it was not specifically asked? If you recycled secondary essays from another program, did you tailor it to fit the new program? And did you make sure to use the right school name? Did you integrate their particular strengths and offerings into your skill set and interests? Did you return the secondaries in a timely manner? Were your secondaries free of typos and grammatical errors? Register for our webinar:  Medical School Reapplicant Advice: 6 Tips for Success! If you can answer â€Å"yes† to these questions, your secondary essays are probably not the source of your rejection. But if you aren’t confident of your answers, this is an area that you should note for your reapplication. Another sign of a problem is being invited to fill out a secondary essay, but not being invited to interview. This is a natural â€Å"weeding out† process that happens throughout the season, but it indicates that your secondary essays need more punch to move to the next stage. Interviews If you were invited to  interview  at a number of schools, but didn’t receive any acceptances, it’s a pretty good signal that your interview skills need a polish.  Let’s jump into our next batch of questions (and remember – you want to be able to answer â€Å"yes† to each of these the next time around): Do you think you practiced enough? Were you comfortable talking about yourself? Were you exceptionally nervous at the interview or did you feel at ease? If you were nervous, was it your first interview? If not, was there anything in particular that triggered your nervousness? Could you speak credibly about each program and did you know what made each one unique? Were you able to explain why you wanted to attend each program? If you had a multiple mini-interview, were you prepared for the format? Were there any questions that stumped you? Did you address these either in your thank you notes or in later communications with the program? If you didn’t get any interviews, you should examine the issues in the sections above – you’re likely to find clues that explain your rejection there. Finally, there are two remaining issues that can significantly affect your application success: Timing Applying late might not be the only concern in your application, but your chance of admission declines as the season goes on. Those who  start the process  early tend to have much better results.  Some questions to ask yourself include: Did you register with the AAMC and/or the AACOM in May and submit your application in June? Did you line up your recommenders early? Did you follow up to make sure they sent their recommendations in a timely manner? Did you take the MCAT early? Were your scores available when you submitted? Did you return your secondary essays in a timely manner? After an interview, did you promptly send thank you notes expressing your interest? Answering â€Å"no† to any of these questions could signal a serious problem. Although some extremely competitive applicants do manage to secure acceptances late in the season, many more are put on â€Å"hold,† wait-listed, or just rejected. Those who do apply later face a larger applicant pool competing for fewer interview slots and, in many cases, fewer seats in medical school. School choice It should go without saying that you need to make sure you  meet each program’s admission requirements. But there are other issues to examine, such as: How many medical schools did you select? Did you choose a spread of schools, including programs both above and below where you think you might be competitive? Were your state’s medical schools included in your list? Above all, did you consider your fit at these programs or did you just choose schools out of the blue? The average med school applicant submits applications to 15 programs. Some submit fewer applications – if, for instance, they will only consider a particular geographic area – while some submit 30+. Highly competitive applicants can target fewer schools, but if your profile is less competitive, the number of schools should be higher. Determining where you are competitive How do you know where you’re competitive? Your basic stats are a good indication. Being close to a program’s mean indicates that you are a strong contender for that program – in other words, if a school’s mean GPA is 3.5, a 3.2 GPA with a strong MCAT score can be competitive. I like to make sure that you’re at or above the lowest numbers the program accepted.  While it’s fine to deviate with a few â€Å"reach† schools, these should not make up the majority of your choices. Also take a look at the percentage of applications accepted. Arkansas COM accepts one in every 4 applications; Mayo accepts one in 50. If all your chosen schools have a low acceptance rate, your profile will have to be much better than average. Beyond your chosen program’s requirements, it’s also important to look at their admission preferences. Did you choose a lot of public programs in other states? Many state schools accept only a handful of out-of-state applicants. (And if your state’s medical schools aren’t on your list, this is a serious omission.) Finally, take a good, hard look at your list of schools. Do you know something about each of them? Are these places you’d really like to attend? If you’ve completed the secondaries for each school and still can’t answer â€Å"yes† to these questions, that is a problem – one you can rectify when you reapply. One more point on application timing By now, you should have a pretty good idea of any missteps in your application. Unfortunately, addressing them is rarely a fast process. Often it takes years. Many people, fearing the time is ticking away, get impatient and reapply before they’re ready. Nine out of ten times, this backfires. Instead, reapply when you are at your strongest. This will take time, but now that you have a good idea of where you went wrong, you’ll be able to focus your energies, enhance your profile, and ultimately submit a successful application. â€Å"Presenting Yourself to Medical Schools: Secondaries, Interviews, School Selection Application Timing† is the third  post in our series:  Medical School Reapplicant Advice: 6 Tips for Success. In the next post, I’ll show you how to enhance your profile. If you want to improve your chances even more, take advantage of Accepted’s  application  review service  to get a tailored assessment of your strengths and weaknesses. Feedback from a reapplicant client â€Å"I sincerely appreciate your support! Im  so  excited about Western Michigan, and still trying to soak in  the news!† We look forward to helping you too! ; A former fellowship admissions committee member and administrator at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Cydney Foote has successfully advised healthcare applicants, including those applying to medical school, dental school, nursing and PA programs, veterinary school, public health and hospital administration programs, post-baccalaureate medical programs, residencies and fellowships. Since 2001, she has brought her marketing and writing expertise to help science-focused students communicate their strengths. Want Cyd to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢Ã‚  5 Fatal Flaws to Avoid in Your AMCAS and Secondary Essays, a free guide †¢Ã‚  5-Step Checklist Before Submitting Your Applications †¢Ã‚  Secondary Strategy: Why Do You Want To Go Here? Reapplying to Medical School Secondaries, Interviews, School Selection Timing With the multi-staged admissions process, applicants can make an impact at each step – or be weeded out. Your assessment continues by looking at other ways you communicated with the admissions committee, and whether or not they helped you past the next hurdle. Secondaries Your  secondary essays  go beyond the initial introduction and flesh out your application. The questions asked will generally give you a good indication of what the program values. In your review, you need to determine how well the information you provided demonstrates your fit with the values and offerings at that particular program. Did you answer the particular questions asked?  (This seems obvious, but you’d be surprised by how many essays miss the point.) Did your secondary essays offer a new or deeper look at your activities or did they regurgitate your personal statement? Viewed alongside your initial application, do they create a consistent but broader profile or is there a significant divergence from what was presented before? Did you research each school to see what made it unique? Did you bring this information into your answers, even if it was not specifically asked? If you recycled secondary essays from another program, did you tailor it to fit the new program? And did you make sure to use the right school name? Did you integrate their particular strengths and offerings into your skill set and interests? Did you return the secondaries in a timely manner? Were your secondaries free of typos and grammatical errors? Register for our webinar:  Medical School Reapplicant Advice: 6 Tips for Success! If you can answer â€Å"yes† to these questions, your secondary essays are probably not the source of your rejection. But if you aren’t confident of your answers, this is an area that you should note for your reapplication. Another sign of a problem is being invited to fill out a secondary essay, but not being invited to interview. This is a natural â€Å"weeding out† process that happens throughout the season, but it indicates that your secondary essays need more punch to move to the next stage. Interviews If you were invited to  interview  at a number of schools, but didn’t receive any acceptances, it’s a pretty good signal that your interview skills need a polish.  Let’s jump into our next batch of questions (and remember – you want to be able to answer â€Å"yes† to each of these the next time around): Do you think you practiced enough? Were you comfortable talking about yourself? Were you exceptionally nervous at the interview or did you feel at ease? If you were nervous, was it your first interview? If not, was there anything in particular that triggered your nervousness? Could you speak credibly about each program and did you know what made each one unique? Were you able to explain why you wanted to attend each program? If you had a multiple mini-interview, were you prepared for the format? Were there any questions that stumped you? Did you address these either in your thank you notes or in later communications with the program? If you didn’t get any interviews, you should examine the issues in the sections above – you’re likely to find clues that explain your rejection there. Finally, there are two remaining issues that can significantly affect your application success: Timing Applying late might not be the only concern in your application, but your chance of admission declines as the season goes on. Those who  start the process  early tend to have much better results.  Some questions to ask yourself include: Did you register with the AAMC and/or the AACOM in May and submit your application in June? Did you line up your recommenders early? Did you follow up to make sure they sent their recommendations in a timely manner? Did you take the MCAT early? Were your scores available when you submitted? Did you return your secondary essays in a timely manner? After an interview, did you promptly send thank you notes expressing your interest? Answering â€Å"no† to any of these questions could signal a serious problem. Although some extremely competitive applicants do manage to secure acceptances late in the season, many more are put on â€Å"hold,† wait-listed, or just rejected. Those who do apply later face a larger applicant pool competing for fewer interview slots and, in many cases, fewer seats in medical school. School choice It should go without saying that you need to make sure you  meet each program’s admission requirements. But there are other issues to examine, such as: How many medical schools did you select? Did you choose a spread of schools, including programs both above and below where you think you might be competitive? Were your state’s medical schools included in your list? Above all, did you consider your fit at these programs or did you just choose schools out of the blue? The average med school applicant submits applications to 15 programs. Some submit fewer applications – if, for instance, they will only consider a particular geographic area – while some submit 30+. Highly competitive applicants can target fewer schools, but if your profile is less competitive, the number of schools should be higher. Determining where you are competitive How do you know where you’re competitive? Your basic stats are a good indication. Being close to a program’s mean indicates that you are a strong contender for that program – in other words, if a school’s mean GPA is 3.5, a 3.2 GPA with a strong MCAT score can be competitive. I like to make sure that you’re at or above the lowest numbers the program accepted.  While it’s fine to deviate with a few â€Å"reach† schools, these should not make up the majority of your choices. Also take a look at the percentage of applications accepted. Arkansas COM accepts one in every 4 applications; Mayo accepts one in 50. If all your chosen schools have a low acceptance rate, your profile will have to be much better than average. Beyond your chosen program’s requirements, it’s also important to look at their admission preferences. Did you choose a lot of public programs in other states? Many state schools accept only a handful of out-of-state applicants. (And if your state’s medical schools aren’t on your list, this is a serious omission.) Finally, take a good, hard look at your list of schools. Do you know something about each of them? Are these places you’d really like to attend? If you’ve completed the secondaries for each school and still can’t answer â€Å"yes† to these questions, that is a problem – one you can rectify when you reapply. One more point on application timing By now, you should have a pretty good idea of any missteps in your application. Unfortunately, addressing them is rarely a fast process. Often it takes years. Many people, fearing the time is ticking away, get impatient and reapply before they’re ready. Nine out of ten times, this backfires. Instead, reapply when you are at your strongest. This will take time, but now that you have a good idea of where you went wrong, you’ll be able to focus your energies, enhance your profile, and ultimately submit a successful application. â€Å"Presenting Yourself to Medical Schools: Secondaries, Interviews, School Selection Application Timing† is the third  post in our series:  Medical School Reapplicant Advice: 6 Tips for Success. In the next post, I’ll show you how to enhance your profile. If you want to improve your chances even more, take advantage of Accepted’s  application  review service  to get a tailored assessment of your strengths and weaknesses. Feedback from a reapplicant client â€Å"I sincerely appreciate your support! Im  so  excited about Western Michigan, and still trying to soak in  the news!† We look forward to helping you too! ; A former fellowship admissions committee member and administrator at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Cydney Foote has successfully advised healthcare applicants, including those applying to medical school, dental school, nursing and PA programs, veterinary school, public health and hospital administration programs, post-baccalaureate medical programs, residencies and fellowships. Since 2001, she has brought her marketing and writing expertise to help science-focused students communicate their strengths. Want Cyd to help you get Accepted? Click here to get in touch! Related Resources: †¢Ã‚  5 Fatal Flaws to Avoid in Your AMCAS and Secondary Essays, a free guide †¢Ã‚  5-Step Checklist Before Submitting Your Applications †¢Ã‚  Secondary Strategy: Why Do You Want To Go Here?

Symbolism of Trains in Anna Karenina - Literature Essay Samples

Throughout the course of Leo Tolstoy’s iconic tragedy Anna Karenina, the presence of trains is essential both in terms of symbolic resonance and as a way to communicate social commentary and setting. Tolstoy employs train imagery as a way to talk about movement in terms of the fast-paced course of life, foreshadowing the desperate saga of Anna and Vronsky’s romantic relationship. In general, the existence of the railroad is meant to be viewed as a destructive force in the context of the novel, something that initiates death and devastation from its first mention in the text. This symbolic relationship is primarily evident during Anna and Vronsky’s initial meeting, their rendezvous on the train, and at the time of and following Anna’s suicide, using the significance of trains to trace the course of their relationship throughout the text as a sort of timeline, navigating the tumultuous end that eventually becomes inevitable for both. The initial mention of the fated train, Anna’s arrival to Moscow, begins the culmination of her relationship with Vronsky, ironically also the first time he is mentioned to her in the text. As he first enters the carriage to meet his mother, his attraction to Anna is obvious- so begins their fated alliance. However, this encounter is pursued by the gruesome death of a rail worker, leaving his mangled body under the train, a precursor to Anna’s death, and what she calls â€Å"an omen of evil† (Tolstoy, 63). This commentary is reflected not only in the fate of the man, but in herself; â€Å"her own personality was to be split in two in the next railroad scene, while she is reading a book. The tragedy was already in the making. The man ‘cut in two’ can become a symbol.† (Stenbock-Fermor, 69). Thus, Anna and Vronsky’s encounter is made dark with the presence of death, hinting at Anna’s imminent demise in the same way, as â€Å"the a ccidental death of a man at the time of their first meeting suggests†¦the manner in which to punish Vronsky and free herself† (Stenbock-Fermor, 65). The scene is also made eerie with the mention of â€Å"a peasant with a sack over his shoulder† (Tolstoy, 58), the same haunting image that will appear throughout the course of the text. What’s more, the reader is left in suspense to whether or not the death was a suicide or not, as the voices in the crowd at the station are heard saying â€Å"What?What?..Where?..Flung himself!..Crushed!..† (Tolstoy, 62), a definite premonition of Anna’s coming end. Furthermore, this beginning scene is also made important because â€Å"Anna’s first appearance is at a railway station, as is her last†¦[making] it possible to argue persuasively that the major railway scenes are the ‘pillars’ supporting the structure of the novel as a whole† (Jahn, 2). Aside from the development of the c entral romantic relationship in the text, the presence of the railroad here, in this crucial scene, can also act as Tolstoy’s particular social commentary on the all-powerful and destructive nature of the railroad, as this â€Å"expressed Tolstoy’s belief that the railroad served only to pander to and further inflame the already monstrous appetite of the idle and privileged† (Jahn, 1). Following this first encounter, Anna and Vronsky’s next confrontation is pivotal in terms of the development of their relationship. As she escapes from his advances in Moscow, Anna flees back to her role as Madame Karenina in St. Petersburg, a literal migration of emotion as she yearns to rid herself from Vronsky’s advances and her own gnawing feeling of self-doubt. When the train stops midway and Anna finds Vronsky waiting for at the platform to confess his love, she is â€Å"seized by a feeling of joyful pride† (Tolstoy, 96). Again, the railroad has expedited her relationship with Vronsky, culminating in a new transition as their romance travels not unlike the ever mobile train. In addition, Tolstoy’s inclusion of â€Å"the bent shadow of a man glided by at her feet, and she heard sounds of a hammer upon iron† (Tolstoy, 96) also draws us back to the first railroad scene, highlighting the similarities between their first encounter and the present o ne in the imagery of the maimed worker trapped under the rails. However, this sentence is more literally translated from its native Russian to â€Å" ‘slid under her legs’†¦more clearly suggesting a foreboding of violence in sexual union† (Browning, 527). Moreover, this image is prevalent throughout the text, particularly a striking image in Anna’s repeated dreams of the bearded peasant. Strongly reminiscent of her reminder of sin and the likelihood of death, she tells Vronsky that she learns in the dream that she will die in childbirth. Although Vronsky too has a similar dream, he better â€Å"embodies the shadow† (Browning, 527) stooping under Anna and catalyzing her self-destruction. In the mention of this discrepancy, we can suggest that the image of the train is Vronsky himself, both a sexual innuendo and a description of the moral evil of modern society. As previously discussed, the inclusion of the railroad can be interpreted as a mechan ism of the pitfalls and industrialization of Russia. Vronsky, with his new-age and elitist attitude of adultery and distaste of marriage exemplifies this, a symbol of the havoc and disruption of the structure of Russian society brought by the integration of the train into upper-class life. To supplement this, it can be noted that although the train that Anna travels in posh and warm, she finds it stifling rather than a comfort, electing the bitter cold of the outside instead. Thus, she casts off the comfort and luxury of elite society that chokes, rather than nurtures her, choosing to partake in a taboo affair with her lover. As she exits the train, she visibly leaves the grasp of society, picking the radical and sentimental over what social structure has wrought for her. Following the preliminary meetings of Anna and Vronsky at the railroad, we are brought to the conclusion of their love at and following the point of her suicide, the full circle of her predestined fate ending as she encounters self-annihilation. As she is crushed under the sharp metal of the train, â€Å"logic leads to the conclusion that Anna was killed by (or, more accurately, made herself the victim of) upper-class society† (Jahn, 3). Again, she sees â€Å"a misshapen-looking peasant covered with dirt, in a cap from which his tangled hair stuck out all around†¦stooping down to the carriage wheels† (Tolstoy, 704), the continuous reminder of her guilt and of the burden she is forced to bear, initiating her suicide. Furthermore, the scene following Anna’s death is also set on a railway, as the Vronsky’s meet with Stiva on a train full of soldiers headed to fight in the Russo-Turkish war. Despite Anna’s death, Tolstoy’s mention of the war , especially on the backdrop of the train, indicates the overlying notion that regardless of death and tragedy, life continues to go on and to progress. Anna’s death has not halted the motion of life; it has only resulted in the greater suffering of others. This is seen on behalf of Vronsky, who like Anna, seeks to end his life in the war to which he is carried to by train. Here, both halves of the illicit pair have reached the peak of ultimate self-obliteration, further fostering the image of the train as supremely caustic and harmful. It is evident that the inclusion of the railway in Anna Karenina is meant to act as a general symbol of destruction and death, as seen through Anna and Vronsky’s initial encounter, their confrontation as Anna flees to St. Petersburg, and at the time of and following her suicide. In general, Tolstoy includes these components as a way to map the pair’s storyline as their relationship progresses, the train both a symbol for Russia’s rapid industrialization and the course of their liaison. The railroad was something that the author viewed as ugly and unnecessary, and so portrayed the interactions between Anna and Vronsky as such, posing a negative connotation of both adultery and the existence of the train. With this in mind, it is possible to say that the railway effects the ultimate demise of this heroine, exerting all of its brutal force and condemning her to suicide, the unfortunate end to her short love. Works Cited Browning, Gary. Peasant Dreams in Anna Karenina. The Slavic and East European Journal 44.4 (2000): 525-36. JSTOR. Web. 21 Jan. 2015. Jahn, Gary R. The Image of the Railroad in Anna Karenina. The Slavic and East European Journal 25.2 (1981): 1-10. JSTOR. Web. 21 Jan. 2015. Stenbock-Fermor, Elisabeth. The Architecture of Anna Karenina: A History of Its Writing, Structure, and Message. Vol. 1. Lisse: Peter De Ridder, 1975. Print. Tolstoy, Leo, and Constance Garnett. Anna Karenina. New York: Barnes Noble Classics, 2003. Print.